“NFL Draft Sustainability Efforts: Critiques and Community Engagement”
The NFL Draft recently undertook an initiative to plant 44 trees in Detroit, aiming to address environmental concerns associated with the event. However, some critics argue that this effort may fall short in mitigating the event’s broader impact.
Navigating New Boundaries in Teaching African American Black History Month
NFL Draft
While the 44 trees could collectively absorb approximately 572 pounds of carbon dioxide annually as seedlings, it’s only a fraction of the millions of pounds of emissions generated during the three-day draft. Despite this, Jack Groh, head of NFL Green, clarified that the tree planting and support for local farmers were not intended as carbon offsets but rather as part of a broader community greening effort.
NFL Draft Jeremy Orr, a Detroit native and advocate for environmental justice, suggested that involving residents from environmentally impacted communities could have made the initiative more impactful. Orr, associated with the Green Sports Alliance, expressed disappointment in the NFL’s efforts, considering its significant financial standing and historical leadership in environmental sustainability.
The estimated 3 million pounds of carbon dioxide emissions from the NFL Draft primarily stem from fan travel, highlighting the substantial environmental impact of sporting events. While NFL Green collaborated with local partners on environmental initiatives, the majority occurred outside of Detroit, with over 5,000 trees being planted in state forests and volunteer efforts at two Detroit farms.
Despite the lack of specific budget details, one Detroit organization disclosed receiving $7,000 from Verizon, a main NFL sponsor, which was shared with another organization. Critics argue that given the NFL’s substantial wealth, it could have allocated more resources to local environmental initiatives.
The NFL Green initiative, established in 1993, aims to mitigate environmental impacts of league events and leave a positive legacy in host communities. While grants are offered to select local groups for environmental projects, there was no open call for community involvement in the draft’s environmental programming.
The sustainability efforts also include carbon offsetting by DTE Energy, making the draft carbon neutral. However, some question the effectiveness of such offsets, particularly when they occur outside of the event location.
Overall, while the NFL’s efforts aim to create positive environmental impacts, critics emphasize the importance of community involvement and greater allocation of resources to address the broader environmental footprint of major sporting events.
